nanog mailing list archives
Re: why isn't nanog moderated?
From: Henry Linneweh <linneweh () concentric net>
Date: Fri, 22 May 1998 14:13:45 -0700
I believe communications should be concise and not long winded and that argumentation should be nil. It is hard to find the source to problems when I can not see the symptom because of rhetoric. Please stick to the operational issues to keep the list members working here. Thanks Henry R. Linneweh Sr. Network Engr,. Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
At 09:11 AM 5/22/98 +0100, Paul Mansfield wrote:all postings should be as succinct as possible, in fact almost truncaso people like you can post silly comments about other people's writing styles
-- ¢4i1å
Current thread:
- why isn't nanog moderated? Paul Mansfield (May 22)
- Re: why isn't nanog moderated? Patrick W. Gilmore (May 22)
- Re: why isn't nanog moderated? Henry Linneweh (May 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: why isn't nanog moderated? Rob Wilson (May 26)
- Re: why isn't nanog moderated? Patrick W. Gilmore (May 22)