nanog mailing list archives
Re: different thinking on exchanging traffic
From: "Michael Gibson" <magibson () netcom ca>
Date: Wed, 27 May 1998 08:43:35 -0400
CANIX is a co-operative peering point for National Canadian Traffic. Currently, they are seven national ISPs exchanging traffic at that point. Mike Gibson - Netcom Canada -----Original Message----- From: Damian O'Gorman <damian () cyberdude com> To: Sean Donelan <SEAN () SDG DRA COM> Cc: nanog () merit edu <nanog () merit edu> Date: 5/26/1998 17:31 Subject: Re: different thinking on exchanging traffic
Of course, not every local ISP participates. The state subsidized education network doesn't connect, nor do some the dialup ISPs. But it gets a reasonable level of support from several of the larger area providers.The same type of project was attemted in Toronto. CANIX was essentially set upto cross connect traffic rather than having to traverse the entire US network to get to the other side of Toronto. The problem was, it became an exclusive bilateral peering arrangemt with 6 players. That was 1 1/2 years ago. Currently only 2 are peered. What in fact was the point. UUnet and Sprint were the big players
up
here and nobody appears to want to cooperate.But exchange points are one of those weird creatures. If I'm paying a big expensive backbone, why would I get anything from a local exchange point? And of course, the ever popular "What's the catch?" Since local exchange points are generally run on a non-profit basis, that means there isn't a large marketing organization, or a huge gaggle of salespeople trying to sell it. If you like, we can call it a "managed connection" and charge you $1,000/month. But that seems steep for essentially a port on a catalyst switch.Damian O'Gorman
Current thread:
- Re: different thinking on exchanging traffic, (continued)
- Re: different thinking on exchanging traffic Tim Salo (May 22)
- Message not available
- Re: different thinking on exchanging traffic Jay R. Ashworth (May 23)
- Re: different thinking on exchanging traffic Tom Perrine (May 26)
- Message not available
- Re: different thinking on exchanging traffic Tim Salo (May 22)
- Re: different thinking on exchanging traffic Sean Donelan (May 26)
- Re: different thinking on exchanging traffic Damian O'Gorman (May 26)
- Re: different thinking on exchanging traffic dirk (May 26)
- Re: different thinking on exchanging traffic Greg A. Woods (May 26)
- Re: different thinking on exchanging traffic D'Arcy J.M. Cain (May 27)
- Re: different thinking on exchanging traffic Damian O'Gorman (May 26)
- Re: different thinking on exchanging traffic Tim Salo (May 26)
- Re: different thinking on exchanging traffic Bob Aiken (May 27)
- Re: different thinking on exchanging traffic Michael Gibson (May 27)
- Re: different thinking on exchanging traffic Damian O'Gorman (May 27)