nanog mailing list archives
Re: IRR/RADB updates vs. ANS?
From: Hank Nussbacher <hank () ibm net il>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1998 09:36:08 +0200
At 10:48 PM 11/9/98 -0500, Jon Lewis wrote:
On Mon, 9 Nov 1998 jprovo () ma ultranet com wrote:When last I dealt with this matter (96), ANS happily listens to minor IRR policy stuff in a timely (hours?) fashion, but still manually configured what they considered a "move" from AS to AS.When FDT got it's CIDR block from ARIN several months ago, I had to call ANS and complain that they were ignoring my entry in radb.ra.net. Seemed awfully primitive.
Ditto. Took a number of emails to get ANS to hear a multihomed blocked from both AS's simultaneously. Seemed like a manual procedure to get it right. -Hank
---dont't waste your cpu, crack rc5...www.distributed.net team enzo--- Jon Lewis <jlewis () fdt net> | Spammers will be winnuked or Network Administrator | nestea'd...whatever it takes Florida Digital Turnpike | to get the job done. ______http://inorganic5.fdt.net/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key________
Current thread:
- IRR/RADB updates vs. ANS? Daniel Senie (Nov 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: IRR/RADB updates vs. ANS? jprovo (Nov 09)
- Re: IRR/RADB updates vs. ANS? Daniel Senie (Nov 09)
- Re: IRR/RADB updates vs. ANS? Jon Lewis (Nov 09)
- IRR/RADB updates vs. ANS? Daniel Senie (Nov 09)
- Re: IRR/RADB updates vs. ANS? Jared Mauch (Nov 09)
- Re: IRR/RADB updates vs. ANS? Hank Nussbacher (Nov 09)
- Re: IRR/RADB updates vs. ANS? Gerald Andrew Winters (Nov 10)