nanog mailing list archives

Re: IRR/RADB updates vs. ANS?


From: Hank Nussbacher <hank () ibm net il>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1998 09:36:08 +0200

At 10:48 PM 11/9/98 -0500, Jon Lewis wrote:
On Mon, 9 Nov 1998 jprovo () ma ultranet com wrote:

When last I dealt with this matter (96), ANS happily listens to 
minor IRR policy stuff in a timely (hours?) fashion, but still
manually configured what they considered a "move" from AS to AS.

When FDT got it's CIDR block from ARIN several months ago, I had to call
ANS and complain that they were ignoring my entry in radb.ra.net.  Seemed
awfully primitive.

Ditto.  Took a number of emails to get ANS to hear a multihomed blocked from
both AS's simultaneously.  Seemed like a manual procedure to get it right.

-Hank


---dont't waste your cpu, crack rc5...www.distributed.net team enzo---
Jon Lewis <jlewis () fdt net>  |  Spammers will be winnuked or 
Network Administrator       |  nestea'd...whatever it takes
Florida Digital Turnpike    |  to get the job done.
______http://inorganic5.fdt.net/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key________





Current thread: