nanog mailing list archives

Re: WCCP talk..


From: "Craig A. Huegen" <chuegen () quadrunner com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1998 14:11:34 -0800

On Tue, Nov 10, 1998 at 11:04:38AM -0500, alex () nac net wrote:
==>> i believe WCCP is more a heartbeat mechanism - the router will age WCCP
==>> 'hello' packets and expire them.  presumably if it doesn't hear one of the
==>> cache engines 'check in', it'll stop forwarding traffic to it.
==>
==>Your missing what I said. What if the cache continues sending WCCP
==>packets, but the cache itself has died?

I haven't yet encountered a situation where the cache was having a problem
and yet was still responding and talking WCCP to the router.

When our Cache Engines have experienced problems, they have removed
themselves from the available pool or stopped responding to WCCP (which,
in turn, caused them to be removed).

In short, I believe there's a very strong mechanism to check all
functions of the cache before saying "hey, I'm okay here".

/cah


Current thread: