nanog mailing list archives
Re: Is it time for an disruption analysis working group for the Internet?
From: Pete Kruckenberg <pete () kruckenberg com>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1998 02:04:54 -0700 (MST)
On Thu, 12 Nov 1998, Sean Donelan wrote:
Have we reached a critical mass of multi-provider disruptions to make it possible to do something yet? Most networked industries have some group which collects and analyzes information about disruptions. What's interesting is how often similar disruptions had precursor events across multiple different service providers. For example, there have been several cases in the last few
[...] How is this handled in other networked industries? I'm sure that the same issues of proprietary information and public humliation exist there; how do they deal with it? Pete.
Current thread:
- Is it time for an disruption analysis working group for the Internet? Sean Donelan (Nov 12)
- Re: Is it time for an disruption analysis working group for the Internet? Pete Kruckenberg (Nov 12)
- Re: Is it time for an disruption analysis working group for the Internet? Howard C. Berkowitz (Nov 12)
- Re: Is it time for an disruption analysis working group for the Internet? Dave Crocker (Nov 12)
- RE: Is it time for an disruption analysis working group for the Internet? Eric M. Carroll (Nov 12)
- Message not available
- Re: Is it time for an disruption analysis working group for the Internet? Jay R. Ashworth (Nov 14)
- Re: Is it time for an disruption analysis working group for the Internet? Pete Kruckenberg (Nov 12)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Is it time for an disruption analysis working group for the Internet? Sean Donelan (Nov 12)