nanog mailing list archives
Re: NSI policy on lame delagations
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1998 08:40:16 -0800 (PST)
if they intend to serve those clients, as opposed to pretending to do so, then they should load thier servers when they are pretending to do so.So you are recommending that if they take 300 new accounts in a day they should reload their nameservers 300 times that day?
then reload once a day, and be hoinest about it, both to the clients and to the world (i.e. nic). this is a no-brainer. people have been doing it for over a decade. there should be no lame delegations. rady
Current thread:
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations, (continued)
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Michael Dillon (Nov 21)
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Patrick Greenwell (Nov 21)
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Randy Bush (Nov 21)
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Steven J. Sobol (Nov 21)
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Jon Lewis (Nov 21)
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Mike Leber (Nov 21)
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Randy Bush (Nov 21)
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Mike Leber (Nov 21)
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Jon Zeeff (Nov 21)
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Paul Vixie (Nov 21)
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Randy Bush (Nov 21)
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Michael Dillon (Nov 21)
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Steven J. Sobol (Nov 21)
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Michael Dillon (Nov 21)
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Steven J. Sobol (Nov 21)
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Roeland M.J. Meyer (Nov 21)
- Message not available
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Jay R. Ashworth (Nov 21)
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations bmanning (Nov 21)
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Paul Vixie (Nov 22)
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Vadim Antonov (Nov 22)
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Paul A Vixie (Nov 23)