nanog mailing list archives
Re: root name servers
From: bmanning () vacation karoshi com
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1998 12:36:12 -0800 (PST)
It is important to have both. You don't want all your name servers sitting in the same rack (plugged into the same 6-socket electric cord), nor do you want all your name servers sitting on the same subnet. It doesn't matter how many you have, if they all go away due to the same problem. $ whois intur.net Registrant: Inturnet, Inc. (INTUR-DOM) 811 Alpha Drive Suite 331 Richardson, TX 75081 USA Domain Name: INTUR.NET [...] Domain servers in listed order: NS1.INTUR.NET 206.97.151.9 NS2.INTUR.NET 206.97.151.8 NS3.INTUR.NET 206.97.151.14 NS4.INTUR.NET 206.97.151.15 -- Sean Donelan, Data Research Associates, Inc, St. Louis, MO Affiliation given for identification not representation
Sean, You neglect to note that these are likely topologically diverse and passed around as host routes.... :) Either that or they are virtual interfaces on the same box... :)
Current thread:
- Re: root name servers, (continued)
- Re: root name servers Russ Haynal (Oct 28)
- Rootshell pages hacked neil (Oct 29)
- Re: Rootshell pages hacked JR Mayberry (Oct 29)
- Re: Rootshell pages hacked JR Mayberry (Oct 29)
- Re: Rootshell pages hacked Joe Shaw (Oct 29)
- Re: Rootshell pages hacked Michael L. Barrow (Oct 29)
- Re: Rootshell pages hacked Joe Shaw (Oct 29)
- Rootshell pages hacked neil (Oct 29)
- Re: root name servers Russ Haynal (Oct 28)
- Re: root name servers Sean Donelan (Oct 27)
- RE: root name servers Kamau Wanguhu (Oct 28)
- Re: root name servers Sean Donelan (Oct 28)
- Re: root name servers bmanning (Oct 28)