nanog mailing list archives
Re: Linux Router KIT
From: Dan Hollis <goemon () sasami anime net>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1998 15:21:07 -0800 (PST)
On Wed, 28 Oct 1998 alex () nac net wrote:
Lots of types interfaces? EIGRP? Things that Linux/PC does have is Hard drives that fail, etc; I guess you could do a flash thing, though. Other protocols, like IPX, Dec, ATalk, etc are not going to happen.
Eh? IPX : http://sunsite.unc.edu/mdw/HOWTO/IPX-HOWTO.html Decnet : http://linux.dreamtime.org/decnet/ Atalk : http://thehamptons.com/anders/netatalk/
Also, for a long time, Linux had a hard time with lots or routes.
No longer applies. In fact Linux is now faster than BSD up to about 60-70,000 routes. BSD is faster at about 200,000. In between its about even.
If you are going to use a PC as a router, use an Unix that has real net code, like xBSD.
Please, leave religion out of the discussion... -Dan
Current thread:
- Re: Linux Router KIT John Fraizer (Oct 28)
- Re: Linux Router KIT Dan Hollis (Oct 29)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Linux Router KIT Adam D. McKenna (Oct 28)
- Re: Linux Router KIT alex (Oct 28)
- Re: Linux Router KIT Dan Hollis (Oct 29)
- Re: Linux Router KIT Jon Lewis (Oct 29)
- Re: Linux Router KIT Stephen Stuart (Oct 29)
- Re: Linux Router KIT Dan Hollis (Oct 30)
- Re: Linux Router KIT Stephen Stuart (Oct 30)
- Re: Linux Router KIT alex (Oct 28)
- Re: Linux Router KIT Matei Conovici (Oct 29)
- Re: Linux Router KIT alex (Oct 28)
- Re: Linux Router KIT Tony Li (Oct 29)
- Re: Linux Router KIT Matei Conovici (Oct 29)
- Re: Linux Router KIT Lon R. Stockton, Jr. (Oct 29)
- Re: Linux Router KIT Phil Howard (Oct 29)