nanog mailing list archives
Re: Peering Policies
From: Paul Ferguson <ferguson () cisco com>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 1999 17:48:25 -0400
At 01:40 PM 4/22/99 -0700, Tim Wolfe wrote:
How does this figure into the future political and technical growth of the net? Wouldn't this type of apathy tend to push toward government involvement in this industry?
Are you insane? I ask that semi-jokingly, but on the serious side, "government" involvement in a capitalist environment has traditionally stifled technical growth, and subsequently revenue. I can only suggest that true capitalism can solve this problem in the long run. If one provider can't live up to their SLA, change providers. $.02, - paul ps. Standard disclaimers apply.
Current thread:
- Peering Policies Tim Wolfe (Apr 22)
- Re: Peering Policies Alex Bligh (Apr 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Peering Policies Paul Ferguson (Apr 22)
- Re: Peering Policies Tim Wolfe (Apr 22)
- Re: Peering Policies Steve Meuse (Apr 22)
- Re: Peering Policies Sean Donelan (Apr 22)