nanog mailing list archives

Re: Re[2]: Portable IP space, isolated networks, BGP, etc... (fwd)


From: "Alex P. Rudnev" <alex () virgin relcom eu net>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 1999 10:14:03 +0300 (MSK)


There is an other way, strange but working - don't use ASn at all, use the ASN
of the providers with some IGP or _bgp over private AS_ protocol. It work.

(I do not advise this, btw).


On Thu, 9 Dec 1999, Randy Bush wrote:

Date: Thu, 09 Dec 1999 14:18:33 -0800
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
To: David Israel <disrael () dedaana dev pgexpress net>
Cc: tim () clipper net, nanog () merit edu
Subject: Re: Re[2]: Portable IP space, isolated networks, BGP, etc... (fwd)


First, it's my understanding that I can use a single ASN for the BGP
peering at each of these networks.  Am I mistaken?
if you don't care to reach one from the other.
Well, you _can_, if you want to put the time and effort into performing
the evil routing voodoo. I can think of a few ways of doing it, without
even bridging over a tunnel. I wouldn't advise it, however.

i disagree strongly.  i think it is a really great idea for our competitors
to deploy.

randy



Aleksei Roudnev,
(+1 415) 585-3489 /San Francisco CA/




Current thread: