nanog mailing list archives
Re: ORBS block
From: Tim Wolfe <tim () clipper net>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 1999 08:49:17 -0800 (PST)
On Thu, 16 Dec 1999, Greg A. Woods wrote:
access-list 104 deny ip 202.36.148.5 0.0.0.255 any access-list 104 deny ip 202.36.147.16 0.0.0.255 anyIf I were anywhere near any network doing that I would consider it to be theft of service by the network operator.
Greg, If Provider X wants to listen to Dean's loony conspiracy theories and block ORBS from going through their network, how is that thef of service? That would only be true if ORBS pays Provider X for some type of service and then they could fall back to whatever options (arbitration, etc) that their contract allows. Dean, Get off your ass and put your own damn filters on your own router. If you can't do that for a technical reason, just add a bogus route on your mail server to those IPs. If you can't do it for a lack of competency reason, which seems infinitely more plausible at this point, please hire someone with a clue to do it for you. I speak only for myself and my dog. Thanks, -- Tim -------------------------------------------------- * Timothy M. Wolfe, Chief Network Engineer * * ClipperNet Corporation / It's a wireless world * * tim () clipper net 800.338.2629 x 402 * * Sufficient for today = Inadequate for tomorrow * --------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- ORBS block Dean Anderson (Dec 16)
- RE: ORBS block Rubens Kuhl Jr. (Dec 16)
- Re: ORBS block Greg A. Woods (Dec 16)
- Re: ORBS block Tim Wolfe (Dec 17)
- Re: ORBS block Alex P. Rudnev (Dec 17)
- Re: ORBS block Paul Vixie (Dec 17)
- Re: ORBS block Greg A. Woods (Dec 17)
- Re: ORBS block Daniel Senie (Dec 17)
- Re: ORBS block Greg A. Woods (Dec 17)
- Re: ORBS block I Am Not An Isp (Dec 18)
- Re: ORBS block Derek Balling (Dec 18)
- Re: ORBS block J.D. Falk (Dec 18)
- Re: ORBS block Paul Vixie (Dec 18)
- Re: ORBS block Tim Wolfe (Dec 17)
- Re: ORBS block Alex Kamantauskas (Dec 17)