nanog mailing list archives

RE: End of year freeze (Re: Y2k silly season)


From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer () mhsc com>
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 1999 17:34:38 -0800


Having similar problems on the SprintPCS network, in the SF Bay Area.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu]On Behalf Of
Deepak Jain
Sent: Monday, December 27, 1999 2:33 PM

On 27 Dec 1999, Sean Donelan wrote:


On Mon, 27 December 1999, Deepak Jain wrote:
Speaking of telephone style networks. Has anyone noticed 
significant 
degradation in their cell/pager coverage/performance over 
the last couple 
of weeks? 

What type of degradation?  I haven't noticed any larger 
than normal problems.


Poor signal strength, unusually high number of fast busies 
when trying to
reach local and long distance land lines. High delays in call 
processing, 
Higher than normal numbers of automatic redials on call-initiation. 

This in areas like Tyson's Corner, South Beach, New York City, and 
surrounding areas. 

From a pager point of view, (Skytel is the easiest to pick 
on). Areas 
that should be 100% full service are showing up in sections as Basic 
service. Basic service areas are not delivering 100% of the 
pages until 
Full service is returned, etc. Same regions. Walking through 
normal Basic 
service areas are showing up as Storing messages (no tower 
connectivity). 
Essentially the same areas as above. 

Many carriers have a end of year freeze on network changes. 
 Although the
freeze has been planned for a long time, I notice it didn't 
stop sales
people from promising due dates during the freeze period.  
If you are
expecting to see new service turned up on Dec 31, I don't think your
odds are very good.

Some of my friends at other carriers told me they had a big 
push to get a
lot of changes into their networks before December 23 to 
beat the freeze.


Maybe, I have been noticing it since about a week before Thanksgiving.

Deepak Jain
AiNET




Current thread: