nanog mailing list archives
Re: Huge smurf attack
From: Michael Dillon <michael () memra com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 05:37:17 -0800 (PST)
On Mon, 11 Jan 1999, Dalvenjah FoxFire wrote:
Heck, the US Military has half of the entries at netscan.org (and they're supposedly the ones worried about "cyber-terrorism").
Much as I hate to say it, this seems to be one area where industry self-regulation has utterly failed. I don't know what would be a better solution; I hate to suggest government regulation. But I'm at a loss here.
Government regulation is clearly the solution. Then everyone would have networks as well-run as the U.S. military... -- Michael Dillon - E-mail: michael () memra com Check the website for my Internet World articles - http://www.memra.com
Current thread:
- Re: Solution: Re: Huge smurf attack, (continued)
- Re: Solution: Re: Huge smurf attack Phil Howard (Jan 11)
- Re: Solution: Re: Huge smurf attack Daniel Senie (Jan 11)
- Re: Solution: Re: Huge smurf attack Dan Hollis (Jan 11)
- Re: Solution: Re: Huge smurf attack Craig A. Huegen (Jan 12)
- Re: Solution: Re: Huge smurf attack Brandon Ross (Jan 11)
- Message not available
- Re: Solution: Re: Huge smurf attack Jay R. Ashworth (Jan 13)
- Re: Solution: Re: Huge smurf attack Jon Lewis (Jan 12)
- Re: Solution: Re: Huge smurf attack Steve Gibbard (Jan 12)
- Re: Solution: Re: Huge smurf attack Alex P. Rudnev (Jan 12)
- Re: Huge smurf attack Phil Howard (Jan 11)
- Re: Huge smurf attack Michael Dillon (Jan 12)
- Re: Huge smurf attack Steven J. Sobol (Jan 12)
- Message not available
- Re: Huge smurf attack Dalvenjah FoxFire (Jan 12)
- Re: Huge smurf attack Ray Everett-Church (Jan 12)
- Re: Huge smurf attack Brandon Ross (Jan 11)
- Re: Huge smurf attack Dalvenjah FoxFire (Jan 12)
- Message not available
- Re: Huge smurf attack Jay R. Ashworth (Jan 13)