nanog mailing list archives
Re: source filtering
From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra () scfn thpl lib fl us>
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 1999 15:04:51 -0500
On Wed, Jan 13, 1999 at 10:37:55PM -0500, Tony Tauber wrote:
On Jan 13, 3:41pm, Scott McGrath wrote:Subject: RE: source filtering GTE and ATT both filter via access lists on the customers CPE routers IF they provide the routers to the customerIt'd be nice if this information came from one of the entities named above. Here's a refinement for our part. GTE does not impose mandatory source address filtering via access-lists on customers' CPE routers. However, we have recently implemented Cisco's "ip verify unicast reverse-path".
I think perhaps we have an acronym collision here. I read Scott's comment to mean "Customer Premises Equipment", since that was the only parsing that didn't introduce a conflict. However, I read Tony's reply as "Customer Provided Equipment", since that's my usual parsing of that acronym. In this case, it makes quite a difference. Clarification? Better: why not, Tony? Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth jra () baylink com Member of the Technical Staff Buy copies of The New Hackers Dictionary. The Suncoast Freenet Give them to all your friends. Tampa Bay, Florida http://www.ccil.org/jargon/ +1 813 790 7592
Current thread:
- Re: source filtering, (continued)
- Re: source filtering Craig A. Huegen (Jan 12)
- Re: source filtering Dan Hollis (Jan 12)
- Re: source filtering Daniel Senie (Jan 12)
- Re: source filtering Dalvenjah FoxFire (Jan 12)
- Re: source filtering Phillip Vandry (Jan 12)
- Re: source filtering Havard . Eidnes (Jan 12)
- Re: source filtering prue (Jan 12)
- Re: source filtering Alex P. Rudnev (Jan 13)
- RE: source filtering Scott McGrath (Jan 13)
- Message not available
- Re: source filtering Tony Tauber (Jan 13)
- Message not available
- Re: source filtering Jay R. Ashworth (Jan 16)
- Message not available
- Re: source filtering Tony Tauber (Jan 17)
- Message not available