nanog mailing list archives
Re: Busy Connect
From: "Steven J. Sobol" <sjsobol () nacs net>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 01:49:05 -0500
On Wed, Jan 27, 1999 at 04:28:39PM -0800, Roeland M.J. Meyer wrote:
So they break the tele for modems and tell the customer that the only solution is to use them as their ISP? If SBC tried this, with pacbell.net, I'd be on on the phone to the FCC, the CPUC, my congress-critter, and my lawyer, not necessarily in that order. I think they call that anti-competitive practice by a monopoly. This is pretty egregious, why haven't we heard more about this, is it a new thing? More curious, how can an RBOC be that dumb?
You work in the industry - why do you even feel the need to ask that question? You know the answer :) (Yes, that was a cheap shot.) -- Steve Sobol sjsobol () nacs net (AKA support () nacs net and abuse () nacs net) "Can you look out the window, without your shadow getting in the way" --Sarah McLachlan - "Building a Mystery"
Current thread:
- Re: Busy Connect, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: Busy Connect Jay R. Ashworth (Jan 30)
- Re: Busy Connect Cyril Jaouich (Jan 27)
- Re: Busy Connect Phil Howard (Jan 27)
- Re: Busy Connect Dean Anderson (Jan 27)
- Re: Busy Connect Steven J. Sobol (Jan 27)
- Re: Busy Connect Andrew Brown (Jan 27)
- Re: Busy Connect Steven J. Sobol (Jan 27)
- Re: Busy Connect William Allen Simpson (Jan 27)
- Re: Busy Connect Jared Mauch (Jan 27)
- Re: Busy Connect Steven J. Sobol (Jan 27)
- Re: Busy Connect Roeland M.J. Meyer (Jan 27)
- Re: Busy Connect Steven J. Sobol (Jan 27)
- Re: Busy Connect Steven J. Sobol (Jan 27)
- Re: Busy Connect Jared Mauch (Jan 27)
- Re: Busy Connect William Allen Simpson (Jan 27)
- Re: Busy Connect Phil Howard (Jan 27)
- Re: Busy Connect Steven J. Sobol (Jan 30)