nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cisco TAC KRAP !!
From: Andrew R Frame <aframe () employees org>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 20:18:21 -0700 (PDT)
they put you on hold to talk to somebody who knows his stuff that doesnt take phone calls. they cant put sr engineers at the frontline.. it would be a waste of talent since 80% of all calls are because customers are less then incompetent. latah, -andrew On Fri, 25 Jun 1999, TOO MUCH wrote:
Over the last year it seems that the quality of service I have received from TAC has diminished. At one time I found myself speaking to a knowledgeable engineer. Who knew the product and protocols involved and they were willing to share information. The norm these days is to get an engineer who knows less then I do. I'm call requesting technical information pertaining to their products, What I get is some clown telling me to hold on while he surfs the internal web page looking for the answer. I can scan CCO myself!! Is it just me ? Phantom hates Cisco or should I say Sissy-Co TAC!! _______________________________________________________________ Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com
Current thread:
- Cisco TAC KRAP !! TOO MUCH (Jun 25)
- Re: Cisco TAC KRAP !! Alex P. Rudnev (Jun 25)
- Re: Cisco TAC KRAP !! Stephen Sprunk (Jun 25)
- Re: Cisco TAC KRAP !! Alex Bligh (Jun 25)
- Re: Cisco TAC KRAP !! Jan Ahrent Czmok (Jun 25)
- Re: Cisco TAC KRAP !! Neil J. McRae (Jun 26)
- Re: Cisco TAC KRAP !! Alex Bligh (Jun 25)
- Re: Cisco TAC KRAP !! Alex P. Rudnev (Jun 25)
- Re: Cisco TAC KRAP !! Andrew R Frame (Jun 29)