nanog mailing list archives
OSPF multi-level hierarchy: Necessary at all?
From: Alex Zinin <zinin () amt ru>
Date: Thu, 27 May 1999 19:36:13 +0400
Hello, We're currently discussing necessity of multi-level hierarchy in OSPF on the WG mail list. The idea is to implement SPF-based interarea routing with more than two levels of topology abstraction and route aggregation (we have two levels in OSPF at the moment level1 being intra-area routing and level2 being the inter-area one). I have some thoughts on how this could be done, but the main question is whether there is a demand for it or not. Everyone is really welcome to share opinions. Thanks in advance, ------------------------------------------------------------------ Alex D. Zinin, Consultant CCSI #98966 CCIE #4015 AMT Group / ISL Cisco Systems Gold Certified Partner http://www.amt.ru irc: //EFNET/#cisco, //irc.msn.com/#NetCisco [Ustas]
Current thread:
- OSPF multi-level hierarchy: Necessary at all? Alex Zinin (May 27)
- Re: OSPF multi-level hierarchy: Necessary at all? Alex P. Rudnev (May 27)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: OSPF multi-level hierarchy: Necessary at all? Alex Zinin (May 27)
- Re: OSPF multi-level hierarchy: Necessary at all? Alex Zinin (May 27)
- Re: OSPF multi-level hierarchy: Necessary at all? Alex P. Rudnev (May 27)
- Re: OSPF multi-level hierarchy: Necessary at all? Alex Zinin (May 27)
- Re: OSPF multi-level hierarchy: Necessary at all? Alex P. Rudnev (May 27)
- Re: OSPF multi-level hierarchy: Necessary at all? Vadim Antonov (May 27)
- Re: OSPF multi-level hierarchy: Necessary at all? Alex P. Rudnev (May 27)
- RE: OSPF multi-level hierarchy: Necessary at all? Jessica Yu (May 27)
- Re: OSPF multi-level hierarchy: Necessary at all? Vadim Antonov (May 27)
(Thread continues...)