nanog mailing list archives
Re: OSPF multi-level hierarchy: Necessary at all?
From: Vadim Antonov <avg () kotovnik com>
Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 14:19:23 -0700
Tony Li <tony1 () home net> wrote:
And this is also ignoring the fact that we have zero routers that are of the scale that you describe today. I'll agree that we will get there... eventually. If the IGPs fail in the meantime, we're still dead.
One can run separate IGPs on inside and outside POP clusters. I toyed with configurations like that back then... nearly got killed by Peter :) --vadim
Current thread:
- Re: OSPF multi-level hierarchy: Necessary at all?, (continued)
- Re: OSPF multi-level hierarchy: Necessary at all? Sean Donelan (May 28)
- Re: OSPF multi-level hierarchy: Necessary at all? Alex P. Rudnev (May 28)
- Re: OSPF multi-level hierarchy: Necessary at all? Alex Zinin (May 28)
- Re: OSPF multi-level hierarchy: Necessary at all? Alex P. Rudnev (May 28)
- Re: OSPF multi-level hierarchy: Necessary at all? Jessica Yu (May 28)
- Re: OSPF multi-level hierarchy: Necessary at all? Alex P. Rudnev (May 28)
- Re: OSPF multi-level hierarchy: Necessary at all? Jessica Yu (May 28)
- Re: OSPF multi-level hierarchy: Necessary at all? Alex P. Rudnev (May 31)
- Re: OSPF multi-level hierarchy: Necessary at all? Alex P. Rudnev (May 28)
- Re: OSPF multi-level hierarchy: Necessary at all? Sean Donelan (May 28)