nanog mailing list archives
RE: RADB Fees
From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer () mhsc com>
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 1999 18:30:37 -0800
Good point.
-----Original Message----- From: Fletcher E Kittredge [mailto:fkittred () gwi net] Sent: Sunday, October 31, 1999 5:26 PM To: rmeyer () mhsc com Cc: 'Mr. James W. Laferriere'; 'Kevin Oberman'; 'Majdi Abbas'; nanog () merit edu Subject: Re: RADB Fees On Sun, 31 Oct 1999 09:51:56 -0800 "Roeland M.J. Meyer" wrote:Free is fine and good, but sooner or later the landlordsneed to be paid andthe fields need harvesting in order to make the bread suchthat the kids caneat. I don't mind nominal fees if it assures the continuedexistance of theservice. My personal concern is that some of these high-dollardot-com maniacs don'tfeel that they have a need to contribute towards the infrastructure.Um, let us keep it the way it is. Whomever pays the piper, calls the tune. regards, fletcher
Current thread:
- RADB Fees Majdi Abbas (Oct 25)
- Re: RADB Fees Kevin Oberman (Oct 25)
- Re: RADB Fees Mr. James W. Laferriere (Oct 25)
- Re: RADB Fees Kevin Oberman (Oct 25)
- Re: RADB Fees Ted Frohling (Oct 25)
- Re: RADB Fees Alex P. Rudnev (Oct 26)
- RE: RADB Fees Roeland M.J. Meyer (Oct 31)
- Re: RADB Fees Fletcher E Kittredge (Oct 31)
- RE: RADB Fees Roeland M.J. Meyer (Oct 31)
- Re: RADB Fees Mr. James W. Laferriere (Oct 25)
- Re: RADB Fees Kevin Oberman (Oct 25)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: RADB Fees Majdi Abbas (Oct 25)
- Re: RADB Fees Dean Anderson (Oct 25)
- Re: RADB Fees John Patteson (Oct 25)
- Re: RADB Fees Patrick Greenwell (Oct 26)