nanog mailing list archives
Re: IS-IS reference
From: "Paul G. Donner" <pdonner () cisco com>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 21:07:17 -0400
So Jack, after all this rant did you get any good advice about IS-IS ;-) At 11:29 AM 9/13/1999 -0700, Jack Crowder wrote:
I was wondering if I could talk with someone who has recently implemented IS-IS. I'm attempting to move a small NSP away from static routing and based on their topology - OSPF would have to be configured all in Area 0. Since the technology provided by this NSP to their customers will include multicast services (video specifically), I thought that I should consider IS-IS while the slate is relatively clean. If there is someone who has implemented this routing on their network that I could ask a few questions of (practical experience), I would appreciate it. Jack Crowder monterey () spies com
Current thread:
- IS-IS reference Jack Crowder (Sep 13)
- Re: IS-IS reference Alex P. Rudnev (Sep 13)
- Re: IS-IS reference Paul G. Donner (Sep 15)
- Re: IS-IS reference Jack Crowder (Sep 18)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: IS-IS reference Vadim Antonov (Sep 13)
- Re: IS-IS reference Alex P. Rudnev (Sep 13)
- Re: IS-IS reference Vadim Antonov (Sep 13)
- Re: IS-IS reference Dana Hudes (Sep 13)
- Re: IS-IS reference Alex Bligh (Sep 13)
- Re: IS-IS reference Alex P. Rudnev (Sep 14)
- Re: IS-IS reference Vadim Antonov (Sep 13)
- Re: IS-IS reference Dave Cooper (Sep 13)
- Re: IS-IS reference Randy Bush (Sep 13)
- Re: IS-IS reference Dave Cooper (Sep 13)
(Thread continues...)