nanog mailing list archives
Re: NANOG applicability (was: RE: )
From: Majdi Abbas <majdi () puck nether net>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 12:43:02 -0400 (EDT)
Actually, in the case of service providers, this is exactly why the "cisco-nsp () puck nether net" was established. Well, it wasn't really established at that site, but that's where it migrated later. The list is available for discussion of cisco service provider specific discussions just like this one. If you want to talk about Juniper routers, on the other hand.... :-) :-)
Then you use juniper-nsp () puck nether net. -snicker- --msa -- Majdi Abbas <majdi () puck nether net> The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man. -- George Bernard Shaw
Current thread:
- [no subject] Gerry McDonald (Sep 21)
- RE: Roeland M.J. Meyer (Sep 21)
- RE: Mike Leber (Sep 22)
- RE: Derek Balling (Sep 22)
- NANOG applicability (was: RE: ) dave o'leary (Sep 23)
- Re: NANOG applicability (was: RE: ) Majdi Abbas (Sep 23)
- Re: NANOG applicability (was: RE: ) john heasley (Sep 23)
- Re: NANOG applicability (was: RE: ) Sean Butler (Sep 23)
- RE: Mike Leber (Sep 22)
- RE: Roeland M.J. Meyer (Sep 21)
- Re: your mail Stephen Sprunk (Sep 22)
- Re: your mail Alex P. Rudnev (Sep 22)
- Re: your mail Alex P. Rudnev (Sep 22)