nanog mailing list archives
Re: Peering Table Question
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 17:28:48 -0700
A large file of baseline traceroutes could replace the benefits of disclosure, I suppose.
if it could, many of us would beg someone to do it RIGOROUSLY and publish. a few problems: o routing is not always symmetric, or i guess rarely is o you would have to do it from'*many* distributed locations to many distributed locations to see all the peering points through the potato fog o heck, due to bgp best path propagation, unless you are on a router with which P is a peer, you can not really tell if C is a customer or peer of P. o and it still would not tell you who is paying whom when it is peering randy
Current thread:
- Re: Peering Table Question, (continued)
- Re: Peering Table Question Randy Bush (Apr 24)
- Re: Peering Table Question Peter Galbavy (Apr 24)
- Re: Peering Table Question Randy Bush (Apr 24)
- Re: Peering Table Question I Am Not An Isp (Apr 24)
- RE: Peering Table Question Marcellus Smith (Apr 24)
- Re: Peering Table Question k claffy (Apr 24)
- Re: Peering Table Question Larry Snyder (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering Table Question Randy Bush (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering Table Question I Am Not An Isp (Apr 20)
- Re: Peering Table Question David Diaz (Apr 25)
- Re: Peering Table Question Christian Nielsen (Apr 25)
- Re: Peering Table Question David Diaz (Apr 24)