nanog mailing list archives
Anyone encountered Cisco ATM PVC large delay bug?
From: "Yu Ning" <yuning () cndata com>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2000 07:28:21 +0800
Hi nanog, I'm not sure how many percentage of global NSP/ISP use ATM PVC to provide links between their Cisco routers. It seems there is some large delay bugs in Cisco ATM interface, esp on GSR level routers. In more detail, our situation is: if we get a high bandwidth PVC, say 51M(or 80M), and if the bandwidth utilization reaches 80% percent, the ATM link will encounter a 1500~2000 ms delay - just point to point ping across the link. We have found this situation is associated with "sar txpool" setting in Cisco GSR, and a manipulation of the "sar txpool" together with bandwidth increasing has solved the problem now. But I still wonder if any of you ever encounter this situation(bug), and how did you overcome it? If you are still puzzled by this bug, I'd like share our temp solution with you. regards, Yu Ning ------------------------------------------- (Mr.) Yu Ning ChinaNet Backbone Operation Networking Dep.,Datacom Bureau China Telecom.,Beijing(100088),P.R.C +86-10-66418121/66418122/66418123(fax) -------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Anyone encountered Cisco ATM PVC large delay bug? Yu Ning (Apr 20)
- Re: Anyone encountered Cisco ATM PVC large delay bug? Alex Rubenstein (Apr 20)
- Re: Anyone encountered Cisco ATM PVC large delay bug? Yu Ning (Apr 20)
- Re: Anyone encountered Cisco ATM PVC large delay bug? Alexei Roudnev (Apr 23)
- Re: Anyone encountered Cisco ATM PVC large delay bug? Yu Ning (Apr 20)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Anyone encountered Cisco ATM PVC large delay bug? Ron Buchalski (Apr 20)
- Re: Anyone encountered Cisco ATM PVC large delay bug? Alex Rubenstein (Apr 20)