nanog mailing list archives
RE: Cutting to the chase (was RE: ABOVE.NET SECURITY TRUTHS?)
From: Paul Ferguson <ferguson () cisco com>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2000 21:33:56 -0400
At 05:36 PM 04/28/2000 -0700, Roland Dobbins wrote:
There was no implication of 'dirty little secrets' intended; on the contrary, Cisco have been great to deal with on issues of this type, and very prompt to disseminate security-related information. I have no problem with Cisco, quite the opposite. What I have a problem with is people who point the finger and shout "J'accuse!" from the sidelines. You folks at Cisco are extremely forthcoming, and your efforts in this sphere are much appreciated.
Thank you. - paul
Current thread:
- Cutting to the chase (was RE: ABOVE.NET SECURITY TRUTHS?) Roland Dobbins (Apr 28)
- Re: Cutting to the chase (was RE: ABOVE.NET SECURITY TRUTHS?) Paul Ferguson (Apr 28)
- Re: Cutting to the chase (was RE: ABOVE.NET SECURITY TRUTHS?) Paul Vixie (Apr 28)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Cutting to the chase (was RE: ABOVE.NET SECURITY TRUTHS?) Roland Dobbins (Apr 28)
- RE: Cutting to the chase (was RE: ABOVE.NET SECURITY TRUTHS?) Paul Ferguson (Apr 28)
- RE: Cutting to the chase (was RE: ABOVE.NET SECURITY TRUTHS?) Paul Ferguson (Apr 28)
- RE: Cutting to the chase (was RE: ABOVE.NET SECURITY TRUTHS?) Travis Pugh (Apr 29)
- RE: Cutting to the chase (was RE: ABOVE.NET SECURITY TRUTHS?) Paul Ferguson (Apr 28)
- Re: Cutting to the chase (was RE: ABOVE.NET SECURITY TRUTHS?) Danny McPherson (Apr 28)
- Re: Cutting to the chase (was RE: ABOVE.NET SECURITY TRUTHS?) Paul Ferguson (Apr 28)
- Re: Cutting to the chase (was RE: ABOVE.NET SECURITY TRUTHS?) Danny McPherson (Apr 28)
- Re: Cutting to the chase (was RE: ABOVE.NET SECURITY TRUTHS?) Paul Ferguson (Apr 28)