nanog mailing list archives
RE: spammers will move offshore?
From: Martin Cooper <mjc () cooper org uk>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2000 20:31:03 +0100
Roeland M.J. Meyer <rmeyer () mhsc com> writes:
SPAM is a side-issue here and not really relevent to losing connectivity with an entire continent.
I don't know -- I think we could probably afford to lose connectivity to large parts of the APNIC database without major issues; it would probably halve the amount of SPAM we get and the amount of time wasted complaining about it to unresponsibe admins as well. M.
Current thread:
- Re: spammers will move offshore?, (continued)
- Re: spammers will move offshore? J.D. Falk (Aug 10)
- RE: spammers will move offshore? Roeland M.J. Meyer (Aug 10)
- Re: spammers will move offshore? Bradley Dunn (Aug 10)
- Re: spammers will move offshore? Gary E. Miller (Aug 10)
- Re: spammers will move offshore? Steve Sobol (Aug 10)
- Re: spammers will move offshore? David Lesher (Aug 10)
- Re: spammers will move offshore? Sam Thomas (Aug 11)
- Re: spammers will move offshore? Gary E. Miller (Aug 10)
- RE: spammers will move offshore? Roeland M.J. Meyer (Aug 10)