nanog mailing list archives
Re: [OT] Valley of the Boyz
From: "Henry R. Linneweh" <linneweh () concentric net>
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2000 08:17:29 -0700
I work with many technically competent women who hold more than 1 degree and not only do the calculations they also work on the bench hands on and create internet equipment. Having 2 daughters I have a different perspective on these issues. The politicization of this group and or networking would be a serious error in judgment, and in 5 years of being part of this group I have never seen any member of the male gender disrespect any woman here. Mob mentality is what ruins societies and those less technically competent use groups to promote themselves, irregardless of gender. It has been my experience to witness this over the last 31 years in computing, unfortunately. blah my 2 cents. Sheryl Chapin wrote:
Ummm, I think you guys are missing the point. The point is that guys live, breath and eat this stuff, but to most women, it's just a job. I am the only female technical person in my (admittedly small) company. One of the guys once described me as "being very good at my job, but it's just a job". I have no problem with that discription, when I go to lunch, I'm not interested in talking "tapes, hard drives and wiring", I do that at work. And yes, I have very little in common with these guys. Most of them go home where there are more computers than people, all networked together and play for hours (by play, I don't mean games, I mean they write programs and expirement with new technology). They *love* this stuff. I go home and don't even look at my computer unless I'm beeped. In a previous job, (again, the only woman) I was invited to stay and play networked doom with the guys one Friday night. I played for an hour, ok, it was fun, I'm done now. They played until 3am. Personally, I always thought it was just me, but maybe it is a gender thing. Is that bad? I really don't know. Sheryl Chapin CommTel Internet At 08:24 AM 8/7/00 -0500, Richard Irving wrote:<rant> So, anybody want to take bets ? I bet the young lady, in the interview, within her first 2 years, makes a BEE-LINE for management, and starts -insisting- everyone wears a tie, so they look professional. Remember, IBM salesman -rammed- "dark tie, and white shirt" down the industries throat.. You weren't -professional- unless you dressed, in this fashion. Corporate America's management bought into this load of malarkey, wholeheartedly. (I suspect their ties were too tight..) So, soon corporate America was looking down their nose at anyone who couldn't play the management conformity game... After all, your not a -professional- with out a dark tie, and light suit. Meantime, back at IBM HQ, at the Watson Research center, the top IBM techs , such as Benoit, were running around in cut offs, and pony tails. Seems, to IBM, this rule was only true for -salesmen-, and trivial technicals, and IBM had a pioneer in their company who went -way- out of his way to make sure R&D TECHNICALS were -not- required to conform. According to his research, good technicals rarely enjoy conforming. It is management, and sales, that admire conformity. Nonetheless, a reality as sold by -salesman=, bought into by -management-, and propogated by -recruiters-, became the norm for technicals... it took us 20 years to throw that perspective out the window... and some big companies -still- by into that load of "stuff". Meanwhile , IBM kept running that research center, -without- such codes.... pointedly. Yes, I feel almost -positive- this young lady will seek management. I really do. Shortly thereafter, she will attempt to correct these errors in the industry, and set us all straight. She will recruit people who cannot stand discussing "tape drives, hardware, and wires", and management will back her wholeheartedly. I just know it. :\ </rant> rdobbins () netmore net wrote:News flash, lady - IT -is- "tape drives and hardware and wires and machines". So, if you have nothing in common with people who areinterestedin such things, go do something else.
-- Thank you; |--------------------------------| | Thinking is a learned process. | | ICANN member @large | | Gigabit over IP, ieee 802.17 | |--------------------------------| Henry R. Linneweh
Current thread:
- [OT] Valley of the Boyz John M . Brown (Aug 07)
- Re: [OT] Valley of the Boyz Richard Irving (Aug 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [OT] Valley of the Boyz rdobbins (Aug 07)
- Re: [OT] Valley of the Boyz Richard Irving (Aug 07)
- Re: [OT] Valley of the Boyz Sheryl Chapin (Aug 07)
- Re: [OT] Valley of the Boyz Etaoin Shrdlu (Aug 07)
- Re: [OT] Valley of the Boyz Dave Bergum (Aug 07)
- Re: [OT] Valley of the Boyz Henry R. Linneweh (Aug 07)
- Re: [OT] Valley of the Boyz Bennett Todd (Aug 07)
- Re: [OT] Valley of the Boyz Nathan Lane (Aug 07)
- Re: [OT] Valley of the Boyz Richard Irving (Aug 07)
- Re: [OT] Valley of the Boyz Jeffrey C. Ollie (Aug 07)
- Re: [OT] Valley of the Boyz Roy (Aug 07)
- Re: [OT] Valley of the Boyz Bennett Todd (Aug 07)
- Re: [OT] Valley of the Boyz Etaoin Shrdlu (Aug 07)
- Re: [OT] Valley of the Boyz Barry Shein (Aug 07)
- RE: [OT] Valley of the Boyz Paul Froutan (Aug 07)