nanog mailing list archives

Re: Qwest/forthelife.net rfc1918 goodness


From: jlewis () lewis org
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 00:27:20 -0500 (EST)


On Sun, 10 Dec 2000, Mark Mentovai wrote:

I used to think that this was wrong also, and I would never build a network
like that, but aside from making for ugly traceroutes, there's really
nothing wrong with it.  RFC 1918 doesn't address this issue directly, but
it's pretty clear that the routers in question don't require network access
beyond the scope of their enterprise, so they are candidates for being
assigned addresses out of private space.  The general public doesn't need to

There are a few other points.  Routers tend to have multiple interfaces.  
Just because a router sends packets in a traceroute with a private IP
source address doesn't mean the router isn't accessible from the internet
via a public address on some other interface...just that interface with
that address isn't, and most likely doesn't need to be.  Some routers
neatly accomodate this by allowing you to specify the IP address they'll
use for all locally sourced packets.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Jon Lewis *jlewis () lewis org*|  I route
 System Administrator        |  therefore you are
 Atlantic Net                |  
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________




Current thread: