nanog mailing list archives
Re: Packet Loss
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 10:51:20 -0500
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000 09:24:04 CST, "John R. Grant" said:
<cringe> that would be 9600 bit per inch GCR format 9-track tape, don't you think? </cringe>
At least in the IBM world, the options for 7-track were 200/556/800 bpi with even or odd parity, and mode=normal/data converter/translator. For 9-track the options are 800 NRZI, 1600 PE, and 6250 GCR. I still have 21 9-track tapes in my office that I need to do something with, as our last system with 3420-style round tapes is being decomissioned in the next few months. -- Valdis Kletnieks Operating Systems Analyst Virginia Tech
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: Packet Loss, (continued)
- Re: Packet Loss David Lesher (Dec 14)
- Re: Packet Loss Andrew Partan (Dec 14)
- RE: Packet Loss Joel Jaeggli (Dec 14)
- Re: Packet Loss Bennett Todd (Dec 15)
- Re: Packet Loss Steven M. Bellovin (Dec 14)
- Re: Packet Loss Larry Sheldon (Dec 14)
- monitoring Michael Long (Dec 14)
- Re: Packet Loss Larry Sheldon (Dec 14)
- RE: Packet Loss Roeland Meyer (Dec 14)
- Re: Packet Loss David Lesher (Dec 14)
- Re: Packet Loss John Fraizer (Dec 14)
- Re: Packet Loss Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 15)
- Re: Packet Loss Marshall Eubanks (Dec 15)
- Re: Packet Loss Hugh Irvine (Dec 15)
- Re: Packet Loss Paul Timmins (Dec 16)
- Re: Packet Loss doug (Dec 16)
- Re: Packet Loss Marshall Eubanks (Dec 15)
- Re: Packet Loss Hugh Irvine (Dec 15)
- Re: Packet Loss Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 15)
- Re: Packet Loss M. David Leonard (Dec 15)
- Re: Packet Loss Stephen Stuart (Dec 15)