nanog mailing list archives
RE: Port scanning legal
From: Mathew Butler <mbutler () tonbu com>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 12:50:57 -0800
If someone leaves their network open to the scan in the first place, it's their own lack of due diligence. However, someone going through a hole that's been detected is bad juju. -Mat Butler -----Original Message----- From: Dan Hollis [mailto:goemon () sasami anime net] Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2000 11:46 AM To: Shawn McMahon Cc: 'nanog () merit edu' Subject: Re: Port scanning legal On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, Shawn McMahon wrote:
Better lock me up; I can't count the number of times I've nmap-ed somebody just to find out what OS they were using, either for personal curiosity, or as part of an argument.
Cool. Since you're obviously in the right, how about scanning some U.S. military networks and letting us all know what OS they are using? If you like, I'll start an argument with you so you have the justification you need to portscan. -Dan
Current thread:
- Re: Port scanning legal, (continued)
- Re: Port scanning legal Shawn McMahon (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal Dan Hollis (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal L. Sassaman (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal Majdi S. Abbas (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal Shawn McMahon (Dec 19)
- RE: Port scanning legal Dan Hollis (Dec 19)
- RE: Port scanning legal Steven J. Sobol (Dec 19)
- RE: Port scanning legal Patrick Evans (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal Andrew Brown (Dec 20)
- Re: Port scanning legal Shawn McMahon (Dec 19)
- RE: Port scanning legal Larry Sheldon (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal J.D. Falk (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal Steve Sobol (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal jlewis (Dec 19)