nanog mailing list archives
Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN?
From: Andrew Brown <twofsonet () graffiti com>
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 13:00:15 -0500
Oh, you're quite right. So, the moral of this story is: If you want your network to look right and act right, don't use 1918 space on your routers.
it's not my network i'm whining about...it's bt. oh well. whatever. grr...grumble...mumble... -- |-----< "CODE WARRIOR" >-----| codewarrior () daemon org * "ah! i see you have the internet twofsonet () graffiti com (Andrew Brown) that goes *ping*!" andrew () crossbar com * "information is power -- share the wealth."
Current thread:
- RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Miguel A.L. Paraz (Dec 28)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Sean Donelan (Dec 28)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Andrew Brown (Dec 29)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? John Fraizer (Dec 29)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Andrew Brown (Dec 29)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? John Fraizer (Dec 29)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Andrew Brown (Dec 29)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? John Fraizer (Dec 29)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Andrew Brown (Dec 29)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Andrew Brown (Dec 29)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Daniel L. Golding (Dec 29)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Andrew Brown (Dec 29)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Simon Lyall (Dec 29)
- RE: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Deron J. Ringen (Dec 29)
- RE: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? John Fraizer (Dec 29)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Geoffrey Zinderdine (Dec 29)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Bill Fumerola (Dec 30)
- RE: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Randy Bush (Dec 31)