nanog mailing list archives
RE: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? (fwd)
From: "Christian Kuhtz" <ck () arch bellsouth net>
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2000 11:31:25 -0500
I am and have been aware of it for a while, it's being fixed RSN. You can quit sending hatemail now. -- Christian Kuhtz <ck () arch bellsouth net> -wk, <ck () gnu org> -hm Sr. Architect, Engineering & Architecture, BellSouth.net, Atlanta, GA, U.S. "I speak for myself only."
-----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu]On Behalf Of Daniel Roesen Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2000 9:49 AM To: nanog () merit edu Subject: Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? (fwd) On Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 03:26:37AM -0500, John Fraizer wrote:Bellsouth: Please patch your spam hole. We all know they'll be using that one now.... for a long time. http://lookup.orbs.org/verify.php3?address=205.152.173.2 Best regards, Daniel
Current thread:
- RE: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? (fwd) John Fraizer (Dec 29)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? (fwd) John Fraizer (Dec 30)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? (fwd) Daniel Roesen (Dec 30)
- RE: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? (fwd) Christian Kuhtz (Dec 30)
- RE: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? (fwd) Daniel L. Golding (Dec 30)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? (fwd) Timothy Brown (Dec 30)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? (fwd) Daniel Roesen (Dec 30)