nanog mailing list archives
Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN?
From: John Hawkinson <jhawk () bbnplanet com>
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2000 21:13:13 -0500
so any isp which lets the outside world see a packet with a source in 1918 space is in direct violation of 1918.
... Nevertheless, the operational reality is that having a traceroute that shows RFC1918 addresses is more useful than a traceroute that shows * * *, and therefore I suspect most operators will continue to permit RFC1918 addresses into their networks as long as a few questionable individuals use them to source traffic. (If they even bother to think about it.) --jhawk
Current thread:
- RE: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN?, (continued)
- RE: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Randy Bush (Dec 31)
- RE: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Derek J. Balling (Dec 31)
- RE: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Randy Bush (Dec 31)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Stephen Stuart (Dec 31)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? John Fraizer (Dec 31)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Bill Woodcock (Dec 31)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Randy Bush (Dec 31)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Mark Mentovai (Dec 31)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Randy Bush (Dec 31)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Andrew Brown (Dec 31)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? John Hawkinson (Dec 31)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Dana Hudes (Dec 31)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Stephen Stuart (Dec 31)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Andrew Brown (Dec 31)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Stephen Stuart (Dec 31)
- RE: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Jason Lewis (Dec 31)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Stephen Stuart (Dec 31)
- RE: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Bill Woodcock (Dec 31)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Adam Rothschild (Dec 30)