nanog mailing list archives
Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmmmm....
From: Wayne Bouchard <web () typo org>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2000 00:03:49 -0700 (MST)
Or cooperate with each other, find the son of a bitch who started it, and prosecute him in each and every state the packets passed through that has computer intrusion laws, so that even if he's found not guilty or given token sentences, he gets that way one trial at a time in 50 states. Lather, rinse, repeat. Should be good for 15 to 25 years of trials. :-)
You forget.. the network is not US only. Any views of this nature are short sighted. International connectivity is still poor but its getting much better. Now consider that given the distributed attacks, you can have sources and relays located in the country you want to conduct your attack even though you are half way across the globe in a country that considers such actions worthy of no more than a shrug. Laws in one country DO NOT apply to other countries. Now consider someone setting up such sites, starting the attack from a hacked account (which can't be traced back to him since he dialed in from a pay phone somewhere) and then just leaving it. This attack could go on to some degree for *WEEKS* without being completely squashed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Wayne Bouchard [Immagine Your ] web () typo org [Company Name Here] Network Engineer ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmmmm...., (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmmmm.... Paul Ferguson (Feb 09)
- Message not available
- Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmmmm.... Shawn McMahon (Feb 09)
- Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmmmm.... Dan Hollis (Feb 09)
- Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmmmm.... Henry R. Linneweh (Feb 09)
- Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmmmm.... Joe Shaw (Feb 09)
- Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmmmm.... Travis Pugh (Feb 09)
- Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmmmm.... Dan Hollis (Feb 09)
- Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmmmm.... Joe Shaw (Feb 09)
- Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmmmm.... Wayne Bouchard (Feb 09)
- Message not available
- Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmmmm.... Hank Nussbacher (Feb 10)
- Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmmmm.... Wayne Bouchard (Feb 09)
- Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmmmm.... Mike Bird (Feb 09)
- Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmmmm.... Randy Bush (Feb 09)
- Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmmmm.... robert (Feb 09)