nanog mailing list archives
Re: CEF Load balancing...
From: "Neil J. McRae" <neil () domino org>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 11:03:53 +0000
On Sun, 16 Jan 2000 20:02:48 +0100 "Sykes, Phil" <phil.sykes () cweurope net> wrote:
A sh cdp neighbors detailed at AMS-IX last week revealed that roughly half of those running on 75xx/12xxx plaforms were running an IOS 12.0, mostly 12.0(5)S and newer. Slightly more than half of those on smaller Cisco platforms were also doing so. Of course, this doesn't mean they're using 12.0 releases elsewhere, but it's a fairly safe bet. There were some major players amongst those running 12.0, but I'm not sure it would be terribly appropriate to name names.
If you need GSR power you really don't have a choice but to use 12. We're running 11.1.CC25 on our 7500's because we've never seen a release of 12 that works well with VIP2-50s. YMMV. We're about to use 12 on some new GSR boxes we have. Regards, Neil. -- Neil J. McRae - Alive and Kicking neil () DOMINO ORG
Current thread:
- Re: CEF Load balancing..., (continued)
- Re: CEF Load balancing... Alex P. Rudnev (Jan 16)
- Re: CEF Load balancing... Mark Prior (Jan 16)
- Re: CEF Load balancing... Jesper Skriver (Jan 16)
- Re: CEF Load balancing... Mark Prior (Jan 16)
- Re: CEF Load balancing... Alex Rubenstein (Jan 16)
- Re: CEF Load balancing... Wayne Bouchard (Jan 17)
- Re: CEF Load balancing... Mark Prior (Jan 16)
- Re: CEF Load balancing... Forrest W. Christian (Jan 16)
- RE: CEF Load balancing... Sykes, Phil (Jan 16)
- Re: CEF Load balancing... Neil J. McRae (Jan 17)
- Re: CEF Load balancing... Randy Bush (Jan 17)