nanog mailing list archives
Re: New form of packet attack named Stream
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 14:33:05 -0800
Actually, you provided enough details, so any unix guy who knows his sockets can write the program in fifteen minutes.
then why have six people written to me asking me to ask jamie for it? </rhetorical> randy
Current thread:
- New form of packet attack named Stream Henry R. Linneweh (Jan 20)
- Re: New form of packet attack named Stream Joe Shaw (Jan 20)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: New form of packet attack named Stream Vadim Antonov (Jan 20)
- Re: New form of packet attack named Stream Alex P. Rudnev (Jan 20)
- Re: New form of packet attack named Stream Pat Myrto (Jan 21)
- Re: New form of packet attack named Stream Richard Steenbergen (Jan 21)
- Re: New form of packet attack named Stream Damon M. Conway (Jan 21)
- Re: New form of packet attack named Stream Alex P. Rudnev (Jan 22)
- Re: New form of packet attack named Stream Alex P. Rudnev (Jan 20)
- Re: New form of packet attack named Stream Randy Bush (Jan 20)
- Re: New form of packet attack named Stream Andrew Brown (Jan 20)