nanog mailing list archives
Re: UK GMT roll over
From: Wayne Bouchard <web () typo org>
Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2000 00:05:22 -0700 (MST)
Isn't it interesting to note that there have been no significant y2k problems but there have been significant service disruptions as a result of paranoia and general cynisism? Can we shoot the press now?
There are also unamusing things like for example the local coffee/doughnut shop being closed tonight when it is supposed to be open 24/7. I consider this to be a serious denial of service by the miscreant who operates the shop. Man does not live by nicotine alone. Meanwhile i sit here like a moron waiting an hour for a non-event to happen. My sole purpose for being here is so that the 'suits' who are out whooping it up, can experience anxiety-free whooping. After midnight i get to dodge drunken revelers on my 33 mile trip home, and tomorrow morning i'll get salt in the wounds when Randy unloads on me for copying this to nanog. I just hope i'm dead when 2038 rolls around. Or is it 2238? I can't remember. Oh well. On Fri, 31 Dec 1999, Alex Pilosov wrote:This is mildly amusing. Looking at headers: On Sat, 1 Jan 100, Neil J. McRae wrote:
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Wayne Bouchard [Immagine Your ] web () typo org [Company Name Here] Network Engineer ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Re: UK GMT roll over bmanning (Dec 31)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: UK GMT roll over Paul Ferguson (Dec 31)
- Re: UK GMT roll over Wayne Bouchard (Dec 31)
- Re: UK GMT roll over Andrew Brown (Jan 01)
- Re: UK GMT roll over Steve Carter (Jan 01)
- Re: UK GMT roll over Andrew Brown (Jan 01)
- Re: UK GMT roll over Dan Hollis (Jan 01)
- Re: UK GMT roll over jlewis (Jan 01)
- Re: UK GMT roll over Simon Lockhart (Jan 02)
- Re: UK GMT roll over Andrew Brown (Jan 01)
- Re: UK GMT roll over Patrick Greenwell (Jan 01)