nanog mailing list archives
Re: bad idea?
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2000 08:38:18 -0700
Given a small, globally routable netblock to be used for front-end web servers, and a strong aversion for using DNS for any type of load balancing, would it be reasonable to build two identical servers farms with the same public IP addresses and rely on the BGP sessions with the hosing providers to remove one advertisement in the event of a problem? I've been looking at ways to ensure that the webservers are always available, short of building a network connecting hosting facilities.Dude, saying things like that on this group is likely to get you executed. Building a discontigious AS isn't the answer.
i missed the part where he said discontiguous as. please point it out to us. randy
Current thread:
- bad idea? Jeremiah Kristal (Jul 05)
- Re: bad idea? Devin P. Anderson (Jul 05)
- Re: bad idea? Randy Bush (Jul 05)
- Re: bad idea? Devin P. Anderson (Jul 05)
- Re: bad idea? Adrian Chadd (Jul 05)
- Re: bad idea? Randy Bush (Jul 05)
- RE: bad idea? Roeland M.J. Meyer (Jul 05)
- Re: bad idea? Randy Bush (Jul 05)
- Re: bad idea? Devin P. Anderson (Jul 05)
- Re: bad idea? Rick Irving (Jul 05)
- Re: bad idea? Brantley Jones (Jul 05)
- Re: bad idea? tony bourke (Jul 05)
- RE: bad idea? Dmitri Krioukov (Jul 05)
- LoadBalancing products: Foundry ServerIron Peter Francis (Jul 05)
- C&W DoS Ian Gulliver (Jul 05)
- RE: bad idea? Dmitri Krioukov (Jul 05)