nanog mailing list archives
RE: Arrowpoint Load Balancing Devices
From: Karyn Ulriksen <kulriksen () publichost com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 18:32:04 -0700
I seem to remember the folks over at Andover being disgusted with the Arrowpoint boxes after a recent denial-of-service attack. You might try searching on Slashdot; I think they posted a pretty fair criticism of the boxes.
Yeah, Jeremy Noetzelman, over at People dug up the links and I read through them. http://slashdot.org/articles/00/05/17/1318233.shtml and http://slashdot.org/articles/00/05/18/1427203.shtml It looks like they had to jump to the CS800 to get stability after the CS100's died. I looked at doing this, but it looked like I would end up with a 16u (size?) chassis serving 6 to 8 servers with no where to move up. Try and sell *that* to a Board of Directors... Karyn
Current thread:
- Arrowpoint Load Balancing Devices Karyn Ulriksen (Jul 10)
- Re: [load balancing] Arrowpoint Load Balancing Devices tony bourke (Jul 10)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Arrowpoint Load Balancing Devices Karyn Ulriksen (Jul 10)
- RE: Arrowpoint Load Balancing Devices Karyn Ulriksen (Jul 10)
- RE: Arrowpoint Load Balancing Devices Karyn Ulriksen (Jul 10)
- RE: Arrowpoint Load Balancing Devices Karyn Ulriksen (Jul 10)
- Re: Arrowpoint Load Balancing Devices Timothy Brown (Jul 10)
- RE: Arrowpoint Load Balancing Devices Karyn Ulriksen (Jul 10)
- Message not available
- Multiple providers w/o BGP (was: Re: Arrowpoint Load Balancing Devices) Timothy Brown (Jul 10)
- Re: Multiple providers w/o BGP (was: Re: Arrowpoint Load Balancing Devices) John Fraizer (Jul 10)
- Message not available