nanog mailing list archives
RE: DNS for interfaces & PPPoE Time Burst
From: John Fraizer <nanog () EnterZone Net>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 14:17:46 -0400 (EDT)
On Thu, 13 Jul 2000, Bob Biver wrote:
Addendum-- To to overwhelming responce: I was simply trying to get a perspective on shaping PPPoE traffic. I would *NEVER* misinform or otherwise attempt to defraud anyone. The account would simply be cheaper than one that was advertised as full bandwidth. This account would be put out there so that *everyone* would know what they were buying 320K down with a 16K CIR up but burstable to 128. Sorry for the confusion- Bob- PS Why does everyone think poeple are trying to 'rip" off customers? you will not stay in business or in your job long if you do that. ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
Some of the oldest ISPs on the planet have been doing it for years. It's called oversubscribing. 288 ISDN ports at a POP being fed with 3 DS1's into the WAN. They're selling "business" accounts with a CIR of 128K. We've run into it twice on WAN connections into supposed Tier-1's. It's sad when you have more connectivity into them than they have to the world (at least at your peering point).. --- John Fraizer EnterZone, Inc
Current thread:
- DNS for interfaces & PPPoE Time Burst Bob Biver (Jul 12)
- Re: DNS for interfaces & PPPoE Time Burst Simon Lockhart (Jul 13)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: DNS for interfaces & PPPoE Time Burst John Fraizer (Jul 13)
- RE: DNS for interfaces & PPPoE Time Burst Eyers, Jerry (Jul 14)