nanog mailing list archives
Strange things which should never happen (was Re: RFC 1918)
From: Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>
Date: 14 Jul 2000 22:14:56 -0700
In article <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007141956280.95155-100000 () overlord e-gerbil net>, "Richard A. Steenbergen" <ras () e-gerbil net> wrote:
I still have not seen a single compelling arguement which says you gain one bit more security by filtering RFC1918-source'd packets. It is useless at best, and disruptive at worst.
I don't know my TCP/IP stack well enough, but what happens when a host with multiple interfaces, one of which is assigned an RFC1918 address, receives an packet through another interface with a source address the same RFC1918 address. Are the stacks smart enough to realize the packet is really an external packet, or will they assume the packet came from inside.
Current thread:
- Strange things which should never happen (was Re: RFC 1918) Sean Donelan (Jul 14)
- Re: Strange things which should never happen (was Re: RFC 1918) Patrick W. Gilmore (Jul 15)
- Message not available
- Re: Strange things which should never happen (was Re: RFC 1918) Patrick W. Gilmore (Jul 16)