nanog mailing list archives

Re: exchange point media


From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 23:32:20 +0200 (MEST)


On Mon, 17 Jul 2000, Richard A. Steenbergen wrote:

A Foundry BigIron doing L3 should, exactly as if it was a router and not a
switch, I believe. At that point there is no real technical distinction
between it and a router with lots of ethernet ports however. I'm not aware
of any exchanges doing L3...

Well, the device should do no routing in the classical meaning of the
word, not on L3 anyway. To do fragmentation it has to be semi-L3-aware
though. It also needs an IP adress to send the needtofrag-ICMPs from.
 
FreeBSD lets you set the MTU based on the route... You could do something
like this, enabling a larger MTU for specific targets, I suppose. I'm not
aware of anyone who is doing this (or probably anyone who would,
especially at L2, without a good reason). This assumes the exchange point
has a switch capable of it.

We're talking L3 here (routers). Normally the L3 MTU is derived from the
L2 MTU, here we would need to derive it from either static configuration
or from the below MSS/MTU mechanism (which I don't think will happen as it
has too much of a "hack" in it).
   
The TCP MSS is negiotated based off the MTU, so yo cannot base the MTU off
the MSS, circular logic. I highly doubt you will ever get support for
jumbo frames auto-negotiated without first standarding the jumbo-frames.   

Yes, it can. Router1 should be able to figure out router2:s MTU from the
MSS of its TCP session with router2. Router2 has no problem here since
it's MTU is the lowest one anyway.

I was under the impression that there is nothing magical about jumbo
frames and that there are no interoperational problems with them as long
as they're supported at all. Please correct me if I am wrong.
 
I for one would love to see an intelligent standard realizing that 1500 is
a remarkably stupid and limiting number, and enabling us to bring new life
to public exchange point peering.

I think any new exchange point technology needs to have an MTU > 1500.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike () swm pp se




Current thread: