nanog mailing list archives
OT: PMTU-D and Chickens
From: "Rural CNE" <bwalters () inet-direct com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2000 07:47:58 -0500
Yes, it's actually 10% lower for throughput. But for the "boot it, reinstall AGAIN, call tech support and listen when they tell you to wave a dead chicken over the CPU while re-re-installing drivers" crowd, it feels 3 times faster... So it *is* 3 times faster.
Is the chicken supposed to be dead? No wonder they keep calling me back... -brad (Rural CNE)
Current thread:
- Re: PMTU-D: remember, your load balancer is broken, (continued)
- Re: PMTU-D: remember, your load balancer is broken Greg A. Woods (Jun 15)
- Re: PMTU-D: remember, your load balancer is broken Greg A. Woods (Jun 15)
- Re: PMTU-D: remember, your load balancer is broken Marc Slemko (Jun 15)
- Re: PMTU-D: remember, your load balancer is broken Greg A. Woods (Jun 15)
- Re: PMTU-D: remember, your load balancer is broken Stephen Sprunk (Jun 14)
- Re: PMTU-D: remember, your load balancer is broken Andrew Brown (Jun 14)
- Re: PMTU-D: remember, your load balancer is broken Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 15)
- OT: PMTU-D and Chickens Rural CNE (Jun 15)
- RE: PMTU-D: remember, your load balancer is broken Deepak Jain (Jun 14)
- RE: PMTU-D: remember, your load balancer is broken John Fraizer (Jun 14)
- RE: PMTU-D: remember, your load balancer is broken Deepak Jain (Jun 14)
- Re: PMTU-D: remember, your load balancer is broken Greg A. Woods (Jun 16)