nanog mailing list archives
Re: using IRR tools for BGP route filtering
From: Danny McPherson <danny () tcb net>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2000 08:36:21 -0600
AS Path filtering would be much smaller than prefix based filtering. Perhaps small enough to work on existing routers. These filters could also be built using registry data, from the ASes that make up providers' as-macros. Not a silver bullet, but probably significantly better than doing nothing.
Though it's certainly better than nothing, it does little more than ensure AS_PATH sequence and integrity .. it provides no protection against invalid announcements. -danny
Current thread:
- Re: using IRR tools for BGP route filtering, (continued)
- Re: using IRR tools for BGP route filtering bmanning (Jun 21)
- Re: using IRR tools for BGP route filtering jhsu (Jun 21)
- Re: using IRR tools for BGP route filtering Randy Bush (Jun 21)
- Re: using IRR tools for BGP route filtering bmanning (Jun 21)
- Re: using IRR tools for BGP route filtering jhsu (Jun 21)
- Re: using IRR tools for BGP route filtering Austin Schutz (Jun 21)
- Re: using IRR tools for BGP route filtering cengiz (Jun 21)
- Re: using IRR tools for BGP route filtering Austin Schutz (Jun 21)
- Re: using IRR tools for BGP route filtering gerald (Jun 22)
- Re: using IRR tools for BGP route filtering John Fraizer (Jun 22)
- Re: using IRR tools for BGP route filtering Jeff Haas (Jun 23)
- Re: using IRR tools for BGP route filtering Mark Borchers (Jun 23)
- Re: using IRR tools for BGP route filtering Jeff Haas (Jun 23)
- Re: using IRR tools for BGP route filtering Mark Prior (Jun 25)
- Re: using IRR tools for BGP route filtering Dana Hudes (Jun 25)
- Re: using IRR tools for BGP route filtering Joe Provo - Network Architect (Jun 25)