nanog mailing list archives
Re[2]: DSL (was shopping for NOCs)
From: "W.D.McKinney" <deem () wdm com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2000 21:46:06 -0800 (AKDT)
"Julian Eccli" <jeccli () ubnetworks net> wrote:
Doesn't this have more to do with the philosophy of the company providing service than the technology being deployed (DSL)? Maybe the problem is that DSL tends to involve LEC people who are infected with the obsolete lazy-monopoly attitude of the incumbents.Hey! I used to work for a LEC in the Frozen East! I take absolutely no offense to the above comment :-) !
Having worked for 2 ILECS previously, they are definetly "infected with the obsolete lazy-monopoly attitude of the incumbents." NOI /Dee
Current thread:
- Re: DSL (was shopping for NOCs) ww (May 31)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: DSL (was shopping for NOCs) Bora Akyol (Jun 05)
- Re: DSL (was shopping for NOCs) Joseph Birthisel (Jun 05)
- Re: DSL (was shopping for NOCs) Chris Williams (Jun 05)
- Re: DSL (was shopping for NOCs) Bora Akyol (Jun 05)
- RE: DSL (was shopping for NOCs) Christian Kuhtz (Jun 05)
- Re: DSL (was shopping for NOCs) Chris Woodfield (Jun 06)
- Re: DSL (was shopping for NOCs) Chris Williams (Jun 05)
- Re: DSL (was shopping for NOCs) Julian Eccli (Jun 06)
- Re[2]: DSL (was shopping for NOCs) W.D.McKinney (Jun 06)
- RE: DSL (was shopping for NOCs) rdobbins (Jun 06)
- RE: DSL (was shopping for NOCs) Vadim Antonov (Jun 07)
- RE: DSL (was shopping for NOCs) Barry Shein (Jun 07)