nanog mailing list archives
Re: Global Crossing Network Problem.
From: Jesper Skriver <jesper () skriver dk>
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 00:05:07 +0200
On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 05:35:32PM -0400, Mohamed Hirse wrote:
I only said SONET because it's layer one. If you can reroute traffic to other circuits that are terminated on other routers that have APS enabled you can offset any or almost any fiber cut. Unless both Working and Protect get taken out by some strange reason. What do you propose?
Having 2 non-protected diverse routed circuits, both live carrying traffic, but not more than one can carry all the traffic when the other fail ... /Jesper -- Jesper Skriver, jesper(at)skriver(dot)dk - CCIE #5456 Work: Network manager @ AS3292 (Tele Danmark DataNetworks) Private: Geek @ AS2109 (A much smaller network ;-) One Unix to rule them all, One Resolver to find them, One IP to bring them all and in the zone to bind them.
Current thread:
- Re: Global Crossing Network Problem., (continued)
- Re: Global Crossing Network Problem. Gwendolynn ferch Elydyr (Jun 27)
- Re: Global Crossing Network Problem. Derrick (Jun 27)
- RE: Global Crossing Network Problem. Karyn Ulriksen (Jun 27)
- Re: Global Crossing Network Problem. Jason Legate (Jun 27)
- Message not available
- Re: Global Crossing Network Problem. Jason Legate (Jun 27)
- Re: Global Crossing Network Problem. Wayne Bouchard (Jun 27)
- Re: Global Crossing Network Problem. Jason Legate (Jun 27)
- Re: Global Crossing Network Problem. Alex Bligh (Jun 27)
- Re: Global Crossing Network Problem. Jesper Skriver (Jun 27)
- Re: Global Crossing Network Problem. Mohamed Hirse (Jun 27)
- Re: Global Crossing Network Problem. Jesper Skriver (Jun 27)
- Re: Global Crossing Network Problem. Mohamed Hirse (Jun 28)
- Re: Global Crossing Network Problem. Jesper Skriver (Jun 28)
- Re: Global Crossing Network Problem. Jason Legate (Jun 27)
- Re: Global Crossing Network Problem. Mark Kent (Jun 27)
- Re: Global Crossing Network Problem. Jason Legate (Jun 27)