nanog mailing list archives
Re: PGP kerserver infrastructure
From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb () research att com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 11:29:39 -0400
In message <Pine.LNX.3.96.1000629104337.11811B-100000 () Overkill EnterZone Net>, John Fraizer writes:
While I agree with the statement, I take exception to any notion that _any_ service we provide would be "marginal." Thus far, my network has a higher uptime percentage than any carrier we interconnect with, period, the end. We planned, built and operate a regional exchange, including the route servers, that has been live 24/7 for 11 months. That is 0% downtime for the route-server platform and the exchange fabric.
The issue isn't so much network availability -- though a key server designed to meet the needs of NANOG folks is interesting, since they most need to talk to each other when the net isn't working well -- as service availability. That has all sorts of implications at the application level. --Steve Bellovin
Current thread:
- PGP kerserver infrastructure Shawn McMahon (Jun 27)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: PGP kerserver infrastructure Steven M. Bellovin (Jun 29)
- Re: PGP kerserver infrastructure Jeff Haas (Jun 29)
- Re: PGP kerserver infrastructure Rick Irving (Jun 29)
- Re: PGP kerserver infrastructure Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 29)
- Re: PGP kerserver infrastructure Rick Irving (Jun 29)
- Crypto restrictions (was Re: PGP kerserver infrastructure) Bennett Todd (Jun 29)
- Re: PGP kerserver infrastructure Jeff Haas (Jun 29)
- Re: PGP kerserver infrastructure Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 30)
- RE: PGP kerserver infrastructure Randy Bush (Jun 30)
- Message not available
- Re: PGP kerserver infrastructure Randy Bush (Jun 30)