nanog mailing list archives
Re: pop server in an ISP environment
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker () brandenburg com>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 14:09:52 -0700
At 04:47 PM 5/30/00 -0400, Steve Sobol wrote:
Other than that, SMTP AUTH works well and is not the nasty little hack that POP-before-SMTP is, and is supported much better than XTND XMIT. (And that it's a standard, whereas XTND XMIT isn't. SMTP AUTH is described in RFC2554.)
Thanks for the response. What SMTP/SUBMIT server are you using? d/ =-=-=-=-= Dave Crocker <dcrocker () brandenburg com> Brandenburg Consulting <www.brandenburg.com> Tel: +1.408.246.8253, Fax: +1.408.273.6464 675 Spruce Drive, Sunnyvale, CA 94086 USA
Current thread:
- Re: pop server in an ISP environment, (continued)
- Re: pop server in an ISP environment Michael Shields (May 26)
- RE: pop server in an ISP environment Dmitri Krioukov (May 29)
- RE: pop server in an ISP environment Roeland Meyer (E-mail) (May 29)
- RE: pop server in an ISP environment Greg A. Woods (May 29)
- Re: pop server in an ISP environment Pat Myrto (May 29)
- RE: pop server in an ISP environment Roeland Meyer (E-mail) (May 29)
- Re: pop server in an ISP environment Shawn McMahon (May 26)
- Re: pop server in an ISP environment Peter van Dijk (May 30)
- RE: pop server in an ISP environment Roeland M.J. Meyer (May 30)
- Re: pop server in an ISP environment Dave Crocker (May 30)
- Re: pop server in an ISP environment Steve Sobol (May 30)
- Re: pop server in an ISP environment Dave Crocker (May 30)
- Re: pop server in an ISP environment Steve Sobol (May 30)
- Re: pop server in an ISP environment Steve Sobol (May 30)
- Re: pop server in an ISP environment Dave Crocker (May 30)