nanog mailing list archives
Re: How long before NIPC decides we need one of these?
From: Adam McKenna <adam () flounder net>
Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 01:24:06 -0400
On Sun, Apr 30, 2000 at 11:14:56PM -0700, Chris Adams wrote:
Defeating Echelon involves only using standard techniques that are a good idea in any case (strong encryption and encrypting everything). This requires ISPs to install the wiretaps at their cost; coupled with RIP this means that you know the government will be recording your traffic and they can very easily require you to give them any encrypted traffic.
Of course you're right. Perhaps steganography tools will become more popular in the UK. --Adam
Current thread:
- Re: How long before NIPC decides we need one of these? jlewis (Apr 30)
- Re: How long before NIPC decides we need one of these? Chris Adams (Apr 30)
- Re: How long before NIPC decides we need one of these? John Fraizer (Apr 30)
- Message not available
- Re: How long before NIPC decides we need one of these? Chris Adams (Apr 30)
- Re: How long before NIPC decides we need one of these? Chris Adams (Apr 30)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: How long before NIPC decides we need one of these? Adam McKenna (Apr 30)
- Re: How long before NIPC decides we need one of these? Chris Adams (Apr 30)
- Re: How long before NIPC decides we need one of these? Adam McKenna (Apr 30)
- Re: How long before NIPC decides we need one of these? John Butler (May 02)
- The Boston *KEY* Party... John Fraizer (May 01)
- Re: How long before NIPC decides we need one of these? Chris Adams (Apr 30)
- Re: How long before NIPC decides we need one of these? Peter Galbavy (May 05)
- Re: How long before NIPC decides we need one of these? John Fraizer (May 05)