nanog mailing list archives
MCI WORLDCOM TO PAY $3.5 MILLION
From: Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>
Date: 12 Nov 2000 17:06:57 -0800
Is it time for the FCC to start actions against Internet Service Providers who improperly announce IP address blocks without proper authorization, such as they do for long-distance slamming complaints? http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Enforcement/News_Releases/2000/nren0009.html Is this the only thing which will get major carrier's attention. It would be great if carriers could be trusted to correctly verify IP addresses before announcing them. But as we've seen in the long-distance world, too many carriers act as if they can get an extra buck, they'll do what every they need to do. When will we see the headline XXXX ISP to pay $NNN million for Internet route hijacking?
Current thread:
- MCI WORLDCOM TO PAY $3.5 MILLION Sean Donelan (Nov 12)
- Re: MCI WORLDCOM TO PAY $3.5 MILLION Mark Mentovai (Nov 12)
- Re: MCI WORLDCOM TO PAY $3.5 MILLION J Bacher (Nov 13)
- Re: MCI WORLDCOM TO PAY $3.5 MILLION Daniel L. Golding (Nov 13)
- Re: MCI WORLDCOM TO PAY $3.5 MILLION David Diaz (Nov 13)
- NIC Handles Walters (Nov 14)
- Re: NIC Handles Steve Sobol (Nov 14)
- Re: NIC Handles Eric Whitehill (Nov 14)
- Re: MCI WORLDCOM TO PAY $3.5 MILLION J Bacher (Nov 13)
- Re: MCI WORLDCOM TO PAY $3.5 MILLION Mark Mentovai (Nov 12)
- Re: MCI WORLDCOM TO PAY $3.5 MILLION John Fraizer (Nov 13)