nanog mailing list archives
Re: Limits of reliability or is 99.999999999% realistic
From: Allan Carscaddon <allan () carscaddon com>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 18:01:53 -0500
At 05:44 PM 11/27/00, Sean Donelan wrote:
and third-party performance reporting, such as http://average.miq.net/ http://internetpulse.com/ http://www.whatsdown.com/
The proper address is http://whatsdown.net, although the performance of porn sites might be a leading indicator of network health ;-).
Allan
Current thread:
- Limits of reliability or is 99.999999999% realistic, (continued)
- Limits of reliability or is 99.999999999% realistic Toby_Williams (Nov 27)
- Re: Limits of reliability or is 99.999999999% realistic Marshall Eubanks (Nov 27)
- Re: Limits of reliability or is 99.999999999% realistic Shawn McMahon (Nov 27)
- Re: Limits of reliability or is 99.999999999% realistic hardie (Nov 27)
- Re: Limits of reliability or is 99.999999999% realistic Bennett Todd (Nov 27)
- Re: Limits of reliability or is 99.999999999% realistic Brian W. (Nov 27)
- RE: Limits of reliability or is 99.999999999% realistic Christian Kuhtz (Nov 27)
- Re: Limits of reliability or is 99.999999999% realistic Marshall Eubanks (Nov 27)
- Limits of reliability or is 99.999999999% realistic Toby_Williams (Nov 27)
- Re: Limits of reliability or is 99.999999999% realistic Allan Carscaddon (Nov 27)
- Re: Limits of reliability or is 99.999999999% realistic David Charlap (Nov 28)